|
Home Up
How was my training?
Extra Material By Chapter

"By
far the most complete and recognized authority on Powered Paragliding"
- Phil Russman
DVD's


Supporter of the
USPPA
Read more in:
Powered Sport Flying
Magazine

All Contents
Copyright © 2009
Jeff Goin
|
| |
Paramotor Powerplant Reviews
The Power of our Pleasure |
See also Chapter 12: Setup & Maintenance
|
The 2-stroke motor is still king
when it comes to PPG. So far only the Bailey 4-strokes have made a dent in
the foot launched market but generator motors have become common on trikes.
There are significant variables in motors. For example, two identical
motors, spinning the same prop, with the same model carb, sitting next to
each other may easily vary by 10%. Accumulated manufacturing variability
is to blame, everything from cylinder honing to propeller shape can add
up to these differences. So it's not appropriate to pin a thrust on a
motor without having broad experience with it. Plus, some makers will
sacrifice power for quiet. While these reviews will offer my opinion on
sound, it must be taken with a grain of salt given all of these variances.
Thrust numbers are my estimation of the power based either on
flying or thrust testing from other than a seller. I try to correct for
extra large props. A machine with 120 pounds of thrust using a 51"
prop, for example, will probably be about 105 pounds with a 48" prop.
Motors will not be reviewed separately from the frame they come with
because each manufacturer has a different implementation -- different
props, carbs, air intake, priming, exhausts, and sometimes even redrives.
Since I'm not one to mount stock engines on a frame, it's not practical.
I'm waaay too lazy for that!
The best bet for those looking to buy just a motor is to look for a
paramotor maker that uses the engine stock. One last thing regarding
thrust: nothing is free. Extra push probably means has more vibration, more
torque twist, and more noise. Not always, of course, but that's the general
trend. Many times three blade propellers help
with vibration but do not necessarily increase thrust. I marvel at an
airplane model by Piper, the Seminole, whose manual clearly showed thrust
was less with the 3 blade prop than it was with the 2 blade prop as
evidenced by longer takeoff runs and slower climbs. So why pay extra for a 3-blade prop? Ramp appeal. Yup, it just looked cooler
sitting on the ramp. |
The Csaba Lemak Electric
|
Vitorazzi Moster 185
2012-June 25 Pollini Thor
with Easy Start
|
This motor's claim to fame is lightweight
power. It is of average loudness and vibration but is remarkably
lightweight. This motor has been tainted by its connection to
Dell Schanze but it is now also available from
Rick Hunts and
a number of imported machines that come equipped with it. In my experience
it has been easy starting and has sufficiently rapid throttle response on
the stock carburetor (Walbro 37). More than anything is that it has great
thrust--enough for high elevations and heavy folks. Maintenance Notes:
1. There have been some exhaust issues that are largely considered
solved. 2. The pull start system has had been somewhat problematic after
between 10 and 20 hours but it is not consistent. Most pilots don't seem to
have the problem but a few have had it recur. Vitorazzi has gone through
several iterations of solutions and feel they have it licked.
3. Over temping was initially a problem that was solved by the adoption
of a special prop that increases cooling right on the head. Vitorazzi is
also working on a shroud for further cooling. |
|
2012 Polini Thor 200
2012-June 25 Pollini Thor
with Easy Start
|
Power is plentiful in this super-smooth
running motor--among the most poweruful units I've tried out, at least on
the four-blade fresh breeze. It's second only to the 294 cc Parajet Cyclone
Rotary engine and seemingly more powerful than Fresh Breeze's 313 Monster
with the same prop geometry. Throttle response depends on carburetion. On
several of them I've had an indistinct low end but, after about 40%, it's
been accurately responsive to throttle position. To be fair, though, one of
those machines was on it's very first flight and the manufacturer said that
they got it ironed out soon after. It comes with an "Easy Start" spring
system. Pulling the starter handle actually winds up a spring that then
cranks the motor when it gets past a certain point. It's really cool since
you're not actually having to pull against a compression point which is what
makes it easier. The drawback won't actually spin the crank faster so, if
the motor would benefit from a bit more umph, you have no way of granting
it. Not a problem if it's running good but, as we all know, there are times
in the field where a harder pull can overcome some minor motor problem.
This motor represents a remarkable breakthrough in that it has tons of
power while ALSO sporting a clutch. Nothing else does that to my knowledge.
One downside is that the clutch and gearbox, all being part of one unit, may
be slightly harder to work on if there's a problem. Not surprisingly, the
tradeoff is weight. The motor is a bit on the heavy side for it's
displacement but, on the other hand, it's power to weight ratio seems
comparable.
This is the smoothest running engine I've yet flown that is still in
production. The one that ties it was Parajet's 160 cc rotary is no longer
being made (their 294 cc rotary is).
Maintenance Notes:
1. There have been some exhaust issues. 2. The Easy Start system is
relatively new so reliability is not yet established although I've not yet
heard of any problems. |
|
Top 80
by Miniplane, 80cc,
weight=26 lbs, Support,
US
Parts, 95 lbs thrust, WG-8 carb., Clutch with geared redrive, fan
forced-air cooled with shroud.
|
This tiny, lightweight motor first
became popular in Europe, especially with competition pilots. It's light weight and low fuel burn for the power
produced made it perfect for competition pilots and everyone else. It can get over 100 lbs of thrust with a 48" prop.
Miniplane, the builder, was first to put it on their paramotor frame but
soon began selling the engine others. Many instructors complained about maintenance issues because certain
aspects were difficult to troubleshoot and repair. For example the dreaded
power fall-off, where it goes to full power for a few minutes then tapers
down. The pull start system
is a bit challenging to work on and, depending on the problem, can require
removing 15 or so rivets to get to it. The cooling fan is housed in that
same unit so it must be deriveted (which admittedly is surprisingly
simple) to replace.
This motor, like all small displacement machines, gets its power by
running at high RPM - over 9000 - so it requires more frequent rebuild if
run hard.
Throttle response is quite good on a properly running motor. I've heard
pilots complain about this and indeed I've flown those with a slow
response but that's because there's a problem. A normally running Top 80
is quite nimble. This is probably the most impressive motor for the amount of
power delivered per pound of weight. It enjoys US support (link above) and
a loyal following although it is now sold on very few production units in
the U.S. As of 2007 it is being on Pap, Fly Products, Miniplane and the I-Flyer
homebuilt kit. Maintenance Notes:
1. Use a resister plug like the BR9ES or a resistor cap like the NGK EM05
which denotes a 5k ohm resistance. Do NOT combine the two resistance devices
lest the spark be too weak. |

Courtesy Miniplane |
Snap 100
by
Cisco, 100cc, 29 lbs, weight=?, 98 lbs thrust, WG-32 carb., Support1,
Support2, Clutch with geared
redrive, fan forced-air cooled with shroud,
|
This elegant motor has only
slightly more thrust than the Top 80 but is easier to work on in most
regards. The
tradeoff is that it's heavier, by maybe 3 pounds.
Instructors seem to have slightly better results with maintenance issues.
It behaves much like the Top 80, with good response.
The starter is much easier to replace parts on, especially the cord.
The fan is also much easier to get to.
One issue has been the center bolt holding the prop hub on. That bolt
likes to loosen and comes out easily in flight. Use Locktite and still
keep an eye on that prop!
Maintenance Notes:
1. Parts can be obtained through
www.SouthernSkies.net for units mounted on Fresh Breeze and from
www.Paracruiser.com for all others.
|
|
RDM 100
by Ross Motors, 100cc, weight≈32 lbs,
110 lbs thrust, WG-32 carb., Support1,
Support2, Clutch with geared
redrive, fan forced-air cooled with shroud,
|
This motor largely
replaced the Top 80 on most U.S. Machines as it offered noticeably more
power albeit with a proportional increase in weight. It allowed heavier
pilots to enjoy the advantages of the clutch, too. Of course the
same-power fuel consumption goes up along with the increase in max hp.
Like all small displacement motors, it gets its thrust at high rpm,
near 10,000.
Behind the Top 80, this had enjoyed the widest use among 100cc units up
until about 2005 when the MZ 100 and Snap 100 became more prevelant. As of May, 2007, I'm not aware of
the RDM being used on any paramotors being
made or imported into the U.S. |
|
MZ 100
by Compact Radial Engines,
98cc, weight=31 lbs,
106 lbs thrust, WG-32 carb., Clutch with belt
redrive, fan forced-air cooled with shroud,
|
This motor was based on the RDM 100
and so shares most of the same characteristics. My experience is that it has
slightly less thrust although that was from some time ago (2003) and the
motor has enjoyed numerous improvements over time. Like all small displacement motors, it gets its thrust at high rpm,
near 10,000.
As of 2007 this motor was being used on the Paratoys Blackhawks and
Paracruisers, among others. I've flown them on both frames and the motor
had good power with good throttle response. They didn't seem to have quite
the thrust of RDM 100's that I've flown but have consistently more than
the Snap 100. Parts are available from
Paracruiser. |
 |
Vitorazzi 100
by
Vitorazzi, 100cc, Weight=? lbs, 110 lbs thrust, ? carb. Clutched with a
geared redrive.
|
This powerplant is relatively new
to the U.S. and comes with a clutch. I've only flown it with a 51 inch
prop on an Paratour SD and it was very powerful. In that configuration it was
probably around 120 pounds of thrust. On a more typical prop (46-48") it would
likely be about 110 pounds of thrust.
Throttle response on the one unit I tried was good but a bit on the
"peaky" side. That's just one individual motor, though and every
model of the other engines has some that are the same way. Plus,
it's just a matter of adaptation and that comes quickly.
The motor used fan forced air cooling with the fan driven by the
crankshaft.
To my knowledge it is currently in use only on the SD line of Paramotors
from Paratour as of May 2007.
|
 |
Corsair Black Devil
by
Aero Corsair, 172cc, 36 lbs, 132 lbs thrust, WG-37 carb. Support
|
This popular powerplant has earned
a reputation for reliability, plentiful thrust and good support.
With the automatic decompressor it can
be a bit challenging to start without doing things just right. Fortunately
there is enormous expertise which makes solving problems
relatively easy. Parts are widely available.
The Black Devil appears to be the most popular motor being mounted to
PPG's and enjoys the broadest support.
Compression Ratio is 11:1.
Earlier motors had fewer teeth in the belt which resulted in lost
belts. That problem and some exhaust issues that have been drastically
improved in the 2006 and later models. All motors now come with wider belt
drives that reduce belt slipping.
It uses an automatic decompression valve that has proven problematic,
from falling out to sticking. Thankfully these problems have been well
documented and are easily solved. Alex Varv, the U.S. importer has earned
a well-deserved reputation for making sure pilots keep their motors
running well.
Apr 28, 2007 I've installed a manual decompressor that completely solves
the starting problem related to the decompressor and makes starting the
motor very easy. The tradeoff is that it will be more difficult to restart
in flight unless you incorporate a foot starter.
It tends to vibrate slightly more than other motors, especially if the
idle rpm is too low. Additional or different motor mounts can improve this
to match or improve on other's vibration levels but doing so moves the
motor further from the mounts.
This motor is used on many frames including the Fly Products, Blackhawk,
SD, Free Spirit and others as of 2007.
|

Photo by Robert Kittila. |
2008 Corsair Black Magic
by
Aero Corsair, 125cc, weight=34 lbs, 115 lbs thrust, WG-? carb., clutched
with a belt redrive. Support
|
The Black Magic was introduced to
North America in 2007 to present JPX Italia's first clutch equipped motor
in a lighter weight package. Being new, reliability will have to wait.
It has good
thrust and throttle response.
I've flown it on a Blackhawk and Fly Products Compress. The idle was too high
on the Blackhawk so the clutch kept the prop engaged (a
simple idle adjustment issue). The Compress was brand new and they were
running it rich for the first few hours so I did not get to see how well
it idles.
Unlike most small-displacement, high rpm motors, it has no forced air
cooling but is also a bit heavier so the heat dissipation may be the same.
Time will tell. It is apparently it's about 4 pounds lighter than the Black
Devil and shares the same mounts.
This motor is being used on Fly Products and Blackhawk frames as of 2007.
|
 |
2008 Simonini Mini 2
by
Simonini, 202cc, weight=42 lbs, 150 lbs thrust, WG-32, Bing carb., belt
redrive.
|
This is the pusher of powerplants.
Widely used for heavy pilots and tandem operations, it has found a ready
market for other craft beyond PPG . There are some with
larger displacements and more power but the Simonini has proven an
excellent power to weight trade-off.
The Simonini appears to be the 2nd most popular motor being installed
in new machines behind the Black Devil.
I've flown it on a Sky Cruiser,
Blackhawk, Fresh Breeze, FlatTop, Walkerjet, and Fly Products. Fresh
Breeze detunes theirs slightly to reduce noise but their implementations are indeed much,
much quieter than most others.
There were problems with crankcase cracks but that appears to be only
on one run of motors as best I can tell.
Several that I've flown with membrane carbs (Walbro, Tillutson) have a
rough mid-range. Not all, thouhgh. Two of the Bing fed units and one
Walbro unit had an excellent mid-range so it's probably in how well it's
set up.
Maintenance notes:
1. For monitoring temperatures, the exhaust gas probe should be mounted 8
centimeters from the piston.
2. Normal max cylinder head temperature (CHT) is between 170° - 200°C.
Normal max exhaust gas temperature (EGT) is 550° - 580°C.
|
Courtesy Siminini
Flying |
Solo 210
by Solo Motors, 210cc, 28 lbs,
100 lbs thrust, WG-32 carb. Support1,
Support2
|
This somewhat dated powerplant
started life as an agricultural pump engine. It has been used on more
paramotors than any other. It's older technology does not give huge thrust
but it was has just the right amount for our application and heralded a
lighter weight machine, becoming very popular in the late 90's.
The stock box muffler model would yield about 95 pounds of thrust but,
with a tuned pipe and 48" prop it would get up to about 110 pounds of
thrust.
Some models came with an automatic decompressor that replaced the
internal hole. Those with only the internal hole required cleaning the
hole about every 10 to 15 hours.
This motor has been used on more frames than any other engine that I am
aware of. Nearly every manufacturer has, at one point, had the Solo 210 as
an option.
As of April 2007 it was only being offered on a few Fresh Breeze models
with their improved head. |

Solo 210 with tuned pipe. |
|
|