|
Back to All Reviews | All
Reviews
This is a compendium of comments on various paramotor
kits that
I'm familiar with and usually have flown (as described in the Flight
Experience). Remember that a lot of preference comes down to personal
taste and all comments come through with some unavoidable bias in that
regard. Every effort is made to reduce that, but it is inevitable. Icon
pictures are 100 pixels wide and, if they have a blue border, can be
enlarged by clicking.
All comments and data by Jeff Goin unless otherwise noted. Much of the
data comes from recollection so verify everything before basing any
choices on specific models. Motor weights are ready-to-fly except fuel (or
batteries for an electric) so they include harness, prop and oil (for
4-strokes). The term "Empty Weight" is universally accepted in
aviation to include everything but the pilot and fuel.
Kits
Here is a brief summary of the existing kits that I know about.
ParamotorKits.com
(Not Fully Reviewed Yet)
I finally flew one of the machines this company is making for Bruce
brown (FlyOhio). It is not the kit but shows that's it's certainly a real, flyable
and likely well-built unit. Hopefully I'll get to fly one at the Florida
show and see how its put together and how it handles. If so, I'll add a
full review.
Power Glider IFlyer
The I-Flyer's claim to fame is that there is no welding. It's built
using pop rivets. The frame is light and holds together just as well as a
welded frame. I've flown two machines that were built using this
technique and both were well built, lightweight and well engineered. It
uses the Sky Cruiser (Miniplane) geometry and harness but does not have a
weight shift option. You could do you own weight shift pretty easily and,
if you're handy enough to build your own, adding weight shift is child's
play. Use an existing unit's geometry, though, it's surprising how much an
inch or two difference makes in placing the weight-shift bar's pivot point
makes.
One machine I flew using the Top 80 motor was incredibly lightweight
and well balanced. I liked it a lot and, with a good running motor,
there's enough thrust for a 200 pounder at sea level.
The web site has almost no information on the kit or the process but I
know of several who have built them. Call Francesco Desantis, who runs the
shop, to find out more.
Build time is probably about 40 hours so it seems comparable to the
Skybolt with a hardware kit. A number of these have been built and there
is hardware support so you can do less or more depending on your time. Pop
riveting is not hard and the tools are probably less than $50. According
to at least two people who have built one, it was fairly straight forward.
I'm not sure if he is still doing this, but at one time you could work on
it at the shop in Florida. Call to find out about this possibility.
Ultralight Plans
There are only two PPG plans out there that I know of, the Skybolt
(reviewed here)
and EasyUp and you should talk with other trusted pilots before falling
for the Easy Up. Read below.
The real deal. There is a group of homebuilders that have flying
machines completed and in various stages of construction. At least one of
the units was flying at the 2007 Phoenix Flying Circus.
EasyUp
I hate to say (for those who have already paid) but the Easy Up is almost a scam. The plans are essentially
worthless and I've never seen one built, let alone fly. I'm sure they
have been but, in all my travels, in all my attended fly-ins, I've never
seen even one. And everybody I've talked to who bought the plans quickly
learned that it was far more involved then initially let on.
It's understandable that you be skeptical of hearing it only here but
look around. Look at the yahoo groups to see which model has an active
support group. Do yourself a favor and ask around.
The
incessant advertising of EasyUp "backpack aircraft" is what got
me to start advertising Footflyer in the first place when I found out how
many people have been snookered by the marketing. Fortunately, they're only
out $95 but, if you're gonna spend the money, spend it real plans that
eventually lead to real flyable products. The EasyUp, for example, has no
hardware option where the others do.
If you choose the kit route, several options exist but not with the EasyUp.
No kit and, more telling, no support group. Any of the kits mentioned above are bonafide paramotor people who
are current and supporting of hardware in the field.
|