Information for
Paramotor Pilots &
Powered Paragliding

Books  Videos  PPG Plans       Educational (by Chapter)  Resources  Reviews  Regs  Troubleshooting

Events  News       Humor  Airline  Entertainment  Political  Articles  Log       Safety  FAQ  Contact

Home
Up


 

How was my training?

Extra Material By Chapter

 


"
By far the most complete and recognized authority on Powered Paragliding"
- Phil Russman

 

DVD's

Meet Powered Paragliding

Risk & Reward
 

Supporter of the USPPA



All Contents 
Copyright © 2008 
Jeff Goin

 
 

Paramotor Review: 2007 Bailey 4-Stroke 175

Reviews, Updated 02-24-2007 | Ratings: 1 is bad, 10 is good | About the Testing

The Bailey 4-Stroke is a wonderful frame/motor package but it's more about the revolutionary engine than it is the frame.  Not that 4-strokes are new, but they are on paramotors. It's not even the first, it's just the first one to be commercially viable. 

Two motors were tested—one spinning a 51" prop with pull start and the other using a shorter prop (don't remember the diameter) with electric start. Both use the same engine with belt redrive, and both qualify as low hook-in machines although not low enough to have lots of weight shift. 

Unfortunately I was unable to weigh either unit but believe they were slightly heavier than my Black Devil machine.

Starting (6): Pull starting was easy. There is a procedure that must be followed since a spark is longer in coming (every other piston peak) but then it starts reliably. It took Paul about 5 pulls. It also comes with a foot starter for in-flight starting.

The machine was stable on the ground with little tendency to tip over in any direction.

Ground Handling & Kiting (5): Standing and walking around were comfortable. Ground handling straps kept the machine hiked up high enough on my back to prevent feeling pulled backwards. A forward lean of about 30° kept me upright without exertion.

Ingress was easy although Paul recommended standing up in such a way as to minimize forward lean lest it flood the motor.

Launch (5): During two forward inflations the lines rose up smoothly along the cage rim. My legs felt the cage bottom while running but did not find it intrusive.

The cage should be strong enough for power forwards for most pilots but you may want to be careful with full power "whack the wing" type forward inflations on large wings.

Climbout (4): Two attachments are available, the original higher ones and the lower ones as tested on these models. Like all low hook-in models that I've flown, the thrust line is above the hang point so the motor thrust is trying to tilt you forward during climbout. The top cage pushes close to the risers until you get seated so be careful about letting go of the brakes.

Getting into the seat was easy, I was able to wiggle into it using one hand. Torque was significant but manageable even at full power. The smaller machine had proportionally less torque twist. Climb rate suggested the same thrust as a good-running 100cc motor.

Flight (6): Flying is very comfortable with great visibility. During cruise the brakes are at a very comfortable position. Adding power does try to tilt you forward somewhat but, since you're seated, it's far less noticeable than while hanging from the straps right after launch.

Weight Shift (3): The comfort bars do not pivot and are not intended for weight shift but some is certainily available. I got about 3 inches of carabiner movement with average effort. Using a lot more effort I could probably extract another inch.

Torque (4): There is a bit more than average torque twist, probably owing to the leaned-back orientation and largish props. From power off to full power I twisted about 20°. It was, however, possible to apply enough weight shift to fly straight even at full thrust.

Thrust (5): 115 and 120 pounds estimated with smooth response throughout. This is what you trade for having a 4-stroke powerplant. It's still plenty of thrust for me and most pilots.

Endurance(9): It sips fuel. Plus, being 4-stroke, you're not burning oil, either. At 60 pounds of thrust (a typical amount required for cruise), it probably burns about 0.8 gallons per hour. It's proven to be the most efficient motor out there at European competitions, several of which it has won. These competitions heavily reward efficiency.

Vibration (6): It is slightly smoother than average.

Sound (9): This is the quietest paramotor now on the market. Only an electric will be quieter and then not by a lot. It seemed slightly quieter than the Fresh Breeze at cruise power as observed during fly-bys but the difference could have been perception. It wasn't just me, either, a lot of pilots commented on how quiet it was.

Safety (5): The machine provides normal protection in a vertical impact and keeps the pilot's butt and back out of the dirt. The gas tank is well protected from the prop.

Using the included foot start would reduce the risk of injury from accidental power-up but most pilots will start it with their hands anyway. The cage's value is mixed. A hand could easily slip through the largish holes but if the hand grabs cage lines it would probably be prevented from hitting the prop at full thrust.

Construction (9): This is one beautifully built paramotor. Attention to detail is apparent and workmanship is outstanding.

Reparability (3): Almost any crash will require new or re-welded aluminum parts which are likely expensive. The motor is obviously unique so damaged parts may take some time to arrive.

Transport (5): Breakdown was not demonstrated but they say it's conventional for a multi-part cage. The cage pieces come apart quickly for transport in a van.

Overall: This is the BMW of paramotors. To hear it is to love it. I loved flying it. Some of that is that I loved listening to me fly it. The 4-stroke offers enormous opportunity for reliability since parts are better lubricated and don't operate as close to the temperature limits. Plus it doesn't have the finicky tuned exhaust issue to deal with. 

Very low fuel consumption has been demonstrated by numerous competition wins in Europe so long flight times are possible. It would be a great machine for an experienced pilot who is not likely to ding it during missed launches or hard landings.

For more information, visit www.baileyaviation.com.

Bailey4stroke17517.jpg (152985 bytes)

I'm doing inflation tests here  without the motor running. Lines came up smoothly with nothing to snag on.

 

 

Bailey4strokeFrRear.jpg (265099 bytes)

Attention to detail is apparent. You can buy it with a pull start or electric start. I'll admit, the ease of starting it in the air was certainly nice. I don't remember if the electric start version can also be hand started but probably not. 

 

Bailey4stroke17508.jpg (249677 bytes)

The paper gives an exact size to use for dimmensioning.

 

bailey_aloft01.jpg (111916 bytes)

You can clearly see the low hook-in points and thrust line as Paul Bailey mugs for the camera.

 

PaulBaileyFlying03.jpg (177479 bytes)

Paul Bailey does well in competition except when he picks up the center stick instead of kicking it.


Home ] Up ] Miniplane Weight Shift ] Yuneec Electric Prototype ] Free Spirit 172 ] Flattop Simonini 2 44" ] Parapower 210 ] Paratour SD Radne ] Fly Power Gold 130 ] Fresh Breeze CB202 ] Parajet Volution ] Paratour SD Nomad ] Paratoys Blackhawk 172 ] [ Bailey 4-Stroke ] Paradiablo 172 ] Known Issues ]

Remember, If there's air there, it should be flown in!