Information for
Paramotor Pilots &
Powered Paragliding

Books Videos Products       Educational (by Chapter)  Resources  Reviews  Regs  Troubleshooting

Events  News       Humor  Airline  Entertainment  Political  Articles  Log       Safety  FAQ  Contact

Home
Up


 

How was my training?

Extra Material By Chapter

 


"
By far the most complete and recognized authority on Powered Paragliding"
- Phil Russman

 

DVD's

Meet Powered Paragliding

Risk & Reward

 


 

Supporter of the USPPA



All Contents 
Copyright © 2009
Jeff Goin

 

 

Paramotor Review: 2005 Parapower 210

Flown 03/12/2007, Reviewed 03-12-2007 | Ratings: 1 is bad, 10 is good | About the Testing
The Polish built Parapower borrows a lot from the Fresh Breeze but in a more standard configuration. The harness is intended to remain on the frame and motor does not jettison. It uses the venerable Solo 210 motor. It uses the boomerang floating J-bars similar like the Fresh Breeze and is the only other paramotor to do so that I'm aware of.

The unit I tested had a belt-driven redrive spinning a 2-blade 45" wood prop, electric start and a stock solo muffler. It used a Walbro membrane carb with no air intake box or filtering.

At the time of this writing there is no US Importer that I'm aware of. The previous importer's website (Andrew Szymikowski's ParapowerUSA.com) is no longer active.

It's 2.5 gallon tank was about half full of fuel so it probably weighed about 65 pounds.

Harrness: High hook-in, floating J-bar.

Starting (6): Starting was brainless using the electric start—it fired after a couple compression strokes. I did not test and do not remember if it also had a manual start but suspect it does.

Ground Handling & Kiting (5): Getting up, standing and walking around were comfortable and a huge opening behind the cage left nothing to impede looking at the wing. Ground handling straps, which are regular harness webbing, allow keeping it hiked up enough to prevent feeling pulled backwards. A forward lean of about 20° kept me upright without exertion.

Ingress is easy and traditional although you're sitting on the ground.

Launch (5): The light-wind reverse launch was standard with no difficulties noted. I did not try a forward inflation but photos show the owner doing so and nothing caught on the lines as they slid up easily. Running was easy and my legs didn't hit the cage bottom.

Torque twist was well controlled, nigh negligible, and I discovered an interesting thing about torque, covered below.

Torque (5): This was the first paramotor that allowed me to change the direction it torque steered. Of course it always wanted to weight shift to the left but weight shift is a minor effect compared with offset thrust. On this unit I could move the thrust line left or right by tilting my body. If I tilted right, the thrust line would push closer to my right shoulder blade, twisting my body left and causing a right turn as it thrusted me to the left, putting the wing in a right turn. If I tilted my body to the left, the opposite would happen and it would thrust my body rightward, putting the wing in a left turn.

I noticed it when I was trying my typical test of putting my legs forward then throttling up to see which way they turned. They didn't at all so I started looking around at the harness connections. As I turned I noticed the twist. Then I started to experiment. This is vivid proof that, with correct motor placement, torque twist can be completely eliminated. Enlightening. The weight shift effect can be minimized but not eliminated.

Thrust (4): Having the lunch box exhaust leaves it a bit lacking in this area. I'd estimate it to be about 95 pounds of thrust.

Throttle response was good throughout.

Endurance (5): Fuel consumption is probably about 1.1 gph and it has a 2.5 gallon tank so you should expect a little over 2 hours of flight time on an efficient beginner wing..

Vibration (5): I didn't notice anything excessive.

Sound (5): This is one area where it definitely diverges from Fresh Breeze, it nowhere near as quiet. It's not too loud, either, I'd say about average for the power.

Safety (3): I'm not at all a fan of the gaping hole in cage's top part. If the motor lurched forward while a pilot was starting it on the ground, there's a high likelihood he's grab for the top hoop and get his hand chopped.

There is standard protection on the bottom for a vertical impact.

The frame bottom front has no sharp edges to catch on while ground skimming.

Construction (5): The unit seems well built with no obvious weak points.

The harness has nice, large pockets.

Reparability (4): Damage resistance is average and it will probably take an aluminum welder to repair bent pieces or they must be ordered from the dealer/distributor.

Transport (5): Partial disassembly seems like it would be very convenient. Unstrap the two cage pieces and put in the car. 

Shipping will require a largish box to accommodate the two larger cage pieces.

Overall: For lighter pilots this would be a good choice. The solo 210 still has a ready supply of parts and, with no tuned pipe, the motor is not tasked heavily. For more information, visit www.parapower.pl. The website is flash-heavy so either disable flash or be on high speed.

 

Lance doing a Forward launch. The lines come up cleanly.

 

 

 

Lance Marczak models his Parapower 210. Thanks to Lance for letting me try his machine.


Home ] Up ] 2010 Nirvana Rodeo ] Rotron 294 ] Miniplane Weight Shift ] Yuneec Electric Prototype ] Free Spirit 172 ] Flattop Simonini ] [ Parapower 210 ] Paratour SD Radne ] Fly Power Gold 130 ] Fresh Breeze CB202 ] Parajet Volution ] Paratour SD Nomad ] Paratoys Blackhawk 172 ] Bailey 4-Stroke ] Paradiablo 172 ] Known Issues ]

Remember, If there's air there, it should be flown in!