|
We recommend that new pilots fly only certified gliders since otherwise
they are being test pilots, to some degree. Even though the motor may change
a wing's handling, and certification is not done with a motor, it's still
helpful to know how a glider behaves without the motor. That is a valuable
starting point.
Since the Powered Paragliding Bible came out, the EN (aka CEN) certification
standard has gained more recognition although the German DHV is still widely used. Here is a comparison of the different bodies. We will
probably start seeing more gliders getting certified using the EN A-D
lettering system.
Paragliders have been tested for years by several organizations to help
insure they are reasonably safe for the intended skill level. Even though
most testing is done without a motor, it's beneficial to have an idea how
your prospective wing will behave when things go awry. It's a valuable
starting point.
Our sport and its gear are unregulated in the U.S. and most other
countries. Germany, however, requires licensing and certification of both
wings and paramotors. No surprise then that the only two organizations
certifying motors and wings for powered use are in Germany:
DULV and
DMSV. We can only hope that
motor testing evolves to include safety standards as listed on
A Better Paramotor.
Changes are occurring in the testing realm as the organizations sort out
what they feel are the most appropriate tests. In the past, DULV has
generally accepted DHV testing then simply flown the wing with a motor to
insure it had no dark corners under power. It's possible for a wing to be
fine for free flight but unsuitable when powered. That's rare, to be sure,
but its nice to have it tested.
Most paragliders have one of the certifications listed below and no specific
motor credentials. In my experience, about one in 20 wings will have a roll
oscillation with certain motors. There's no predicting which ones and it's
easily controlled. Of the ones that have had it, none have been divergent
(continuously getting worse). A wing may do it on one motor but not another
and vice versa. Wings that are excessively slow or prone to parachutal stall
should be avoided with power.
Reflex gliders struggle with certification because the current testing
methods consider recovery from maladies (such as collapses) rather than
resistance. Reflex gliders strive to resist collapses but when they do
happen, recovery can be very dynamic—it's a trade off. Current certification
standards don't recognize this trade.
Certification Comparison
| Organization |
Rating Values |
Differences |
| DHV - German |
1, 1-2, 2, 2-3, 3 |
For collapses and other maneuvers, rates based more on
recovery than entry resistance. Test pilot makes the ratings. |
| EN (CEN) - European |
A, B, C, D |
Combination of entry resistance and ease of recovery. |
SHV - Swiss
& AFNOR |
Standard, Performance, Competition |
|
| DULV |
Standard, Advanced, Competition |
Concentrates on testing with a motor in
those areas more likely to cause problems under power. |
| DMSV |
Standard, Performance, Competition |
|
Certification Rating Equivalents
| DHV |
AFNOR |
CEN |
Description |
| 1 |
Standard |
A |
Most benign handling, quickest to recover from deflations, spins
and other maladies with no pilot input. |
| 1-2 |
Standard |
B |
Fairly benign handling, quick to recover from deflations, spins
and other maladies with minimal pilot input. |
| 2 |
Performance |
C |
More demanding characteristics and stronger reactions to
turbulence, deflations and other maladies. Not as forgiving. |
| 2-3 |
Performance |
C |
More demanding characteristics and stronger reactions to
turbulence, deflations and other maladies. For highly skilled pilots. |
| 3 |
Competition |
D |
Most demanding characteristics. Requires advanced handling in
deflations and other maladies. For highly skilled and risk-tolerant
pilots. |
|
Current Certifying Bodies
Germany has so many orgs for certification because
certification is required of their equipment.
DULV - German powered aviation certification body.
Somewhat less stringent requirements but testing is done mostly with a motor.
DMSV - German Paramotoring Association. Testing is
done with mostly with a motor. DHV -
German hang gliding and paragliding aviation certification body. The sport
is more regulated in Germany than probably any other country and these
certifications are required. They emphasize recovery behaviors.
EN (CEN) - European standards body. Their website
lists a 4-tiered naming convention, A through D, where A and B are like DHV
1 and DHV 1-2. C is like DHV 2 and D is like DHV 3. It was CEN when the
committee was forming the standards, now it's officially just EN.
SHV (FSVL) Swiss Hang Gliding and Paragliding
Organization. Adopted AFNOR standards
Related Organizations
EHPU European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union. Former Certifying
Bodies
A.F.NOR - (was APCUL until
1994) French certification organization. Paragliders have 3 tiers: standard
(similar to DHV 1), performance (similar to DHV 2) and competition (similar
to DHV 3). These were pass/fail tests rather than the numbered results used
by the DHV.
FFVL French Hang Gliding and Paragliding
Association. Only a very few paragliders were certified under this
organization and I've never seen one. ACPUL
became A.F.NOR in 1994. |
DHV classification of paragliders
courtesy www.DHV.de
The classification scheme gives a scale for the level
of pilot skills required for safe operation.
The classification is obtained through test flights as
part of the DHV/OeAeC type test procedure. These tests are meant to
provide safety relevant information, but certainly not to measure
performance.
The overall classification of a glider is found by
taking the highest (e.g. most demanding) classification obtained in any
single test flight category.
The classification of a paraglider may contain a
suffix denoting the restriction to a certain class of harnesses to be used
with this glider.
|
Classification |
Addition |
Description |
|
1 |
|
Paragliders with simple and very forgiving
flying characteristics. |
|
1-2 |
|
Paragliders with good-natured flying
characteristics. |
|
2 |
|
Paragliders with demanding flying
characteristics and potentially dynamic reactions to turbulence and
pilot errors. Recommended for regularly flying pilots. |
|
2-3 |
|
Paragliders with very demanding flying
characteristics and potentially violent reactions to turbulence and
pilot errors. Recommended for experienced and regularly flying
pilots. |
|
3 |
|
Paragliders with very demanding flying
characteristics and potentially very violent reactions to turbulence
and pilot errors, little scope for pilot errors. For expert pilots.
|
|
|
G |
Only explicitly listed types of harnesses |
|
|
GH |
"H"-braced harnesses - any group GH harness may
be used with that glider (=almost all modern DHV/OeAeC-certified
harnesses) |
|
|
GX |
Cross-braced harnesses - any group GX harness
may be used with that glider |
|
|
Biplace
|
Certified for biplace operation
|
|
|
Y |
Hang type harness (for historic reasons)
|
|
|
S |
Special harness |
The performance of today's class 1 and 1-2 gliders is
pretty close to the performance of more demanding gliders. As their
good-natured flight characteristics give a high level of active and
passive safety, they are recommended to anybody who doesn't fly regularly
or whose motivation to fly is fun rather than ambition.
On the other hand class 2 gliders, which were formerly
used in training, due to their higher speed-potential today require an
actively flying pilot who knows how to recover from abnormal flight
situations.
Experienced pilots of course will like their handling
characteristics and their high rate of active safety, which is combined
with a level of performance equaling that of high performance competition
wings just a couple of years ago.
When viewing test reports you should bear in mind that
test flights are flown and evaluated in a well-standardized manner, as
this is the only way to achieve reproducible test results. This gives you
an objective scale to compare gliders, but any statement concerning
in-flight characteristics applies in absolute precision only to maneuvers
flown in a standardized manner under perfect test conditions.
Any safety relevant observations of the test pilot
which are not covered by the standardized test flight evaluation are
quoted under "Additional flight safety remarks" at the end of the test
report |

courtesy www.dhv.de |